Exploring the Meaning of Opheile in Greek
ὀφειλή (Opheile) means “debt” and appears three times: Matthew 18:32, Romans 13:7, and 1 Corinthians 7:3.
Forgiven Debt
In Matthew 18:32, a lord declares he forgave a servant “all that debt” after being begged.
Learn More →Owed Obligations
Romans 13:7 uses it for what is owed (taxes, customs, respect), and 1 Corinthians 7:3 for affection owed between spouses.
Learn More →ὀφειλή refers to a “debt” and appears in three New Testament settings: a parable about forgiveness, an exhortation about public and social obligations, and counsel about marital responsibilities. In each, the term brings the idea of something owed into view, whether canceled, paid, or rendered.

Root and Related Words
ὀφειλή is derived from the verb opheilo (ὀφείλω), “to owe” (Strong’s G3784). The noun names the obligation that corresponds to owing.

Occurrences
“Then his lord called him in, and said to him, ‘You wicked servant! I forgave you all that debt, because you begged me.” (Matthew 18:32)
Here ὀφειλή is placed in the mouth of the master (“his lord”) as he confronts the servant. The “debt” is not merely mentioned; it is recalled as something already dealt with: “I forgave you all that debt.” The narrative force lies in the master’s action of forgiveness in response to the servant’s plea (“because you begged me”). The word therefore functions as the concrete object of the forgiveness described—the thing that had stood against the servant and that the master has released. Because the master is now calling the servant “wicked,” the remembered cancellation of the ὀφειλή heightens the moral seriousness of the servant’s present posture; the scene assumes that a forgiven obligation should shape how one acts afterward, even though that expected response is not stated in this single sentence.

“Therefore give everyone what you owe: if you owe taxes, pay taxes; if customs, then customs; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor.” (Romans 13:7)
In Romans 13:7 the idea of owing governs a series of practical directives. The verse presses for a comprehensive settling of obligations: “give everyone what you owe.” The list that follows moves through different kinds of things rendered—“taxes,” “customs,” “respect,” “honor.” Within that flow, ὀφειλή contributes the conceptual category that binds these items together: they are owed, and what is owed should be given. The arrangement is notable for its breadth: some obligations are monetary (taxes, customs) while others are relational and social (respect, honor). The word “debt” in this context highlights that obligations are not limited to financial accounts; they can also describe what is due in the way people are treated. The verse’s repeated conditional framing (“if…”) keeps the focus on fitting payment to the specific kind of obligation that exists.
“Let the husband give his wife the affection owed her, and likewise also the wife her husband.” (1 Corinthians 7:3)
In 1 Corinthians 7:3 ὀφειλή is applied within marriage. The instruction is reciprocal and symmetrical: the husband is to give “the affection owed her,” and “likewise” the wife is to give affection to her husband. The “debt” language defines that affection in terms of obligation—something due to the other spouse—rather than as a voluntary extra. At the same time, the wording keeps the obligation personally directed: it is owed “her” and owed “her husband,” not abstractly owed to an institution or an impersonal standard. By placing ὀφειλή alongside “give,” the verse portrays the marital relationship as involving rightful claims that should be met through concrete action, and it underscores mutuality by using the same structure for both partners.
Sense and Usage
Across these three occurrences, “debt” operates as a flexible label for what is due, and its rhetorical effect depends on whether the obligation is canceled, paid, or rendered in a relationship. In Matthew 18:32, the debt is remembered as something forgiven; the term gathers up the servant’s liability into a single object that can be released by the master’s decision. The scene makes the debt feel weighty not by describing its amount, but by connecting it directly to the servant’s desperate appeal (“because you begged me”) and to the master’s explicit forgiveness (“I forgave you all that debt”).
Romans 13:7 extends the debt idea into daily life by attaching it to specific, recognizable duties: “taxes” and “customs” on one side, “respect” and “honor” on the other. This use shows how “debt” can frame both material payment and social conduct as matters of obligation. The verse’s structure reinforces the point: each kind of owing calls for a corresponding act of giving (“pay taxes… then customs… then respect… then honor”). The concept of debt, therefore, becomes an organizing principle for responsible behavior toward “everyone,” not merely toward a single creditor.
In 1 Corinthians 7:3, “debt” is brought into the private sphere of marriage and attached to “affection.” The term gives the instruction a sense of due right: affection is not portrayed as optional or one-sided, but as something each spouse owes the other. The mutual phrasing (“likewise also”) makes the obligation balanced. In this setting, “debt” does not evoke the cancellation seen in Matthew 18:32 or the civil payments of Romans 13:7; instead, it frames an ongoing responsibility expressed through giving.
Together, these passages show that ὀφειλή can mark an obligation that is (1) real enough to be forgiven, (2) concrete enough to be paid in public life, and (3) personal enough to be rendered as affection within marriage. The underlying idea remains consistent: a debt is something owed, and the moral or practical question becomes what is done with what is owed—released, settled, or faithfully given.
Imagery
The imagery carried by ὀφειλή in these texts moves from an account that can be forgiven (Matthew 18:32), to a set of dues that should be paid (Romans 13:7), to an obligation that takes the form of mutual giving within a household (1 Corinthians 7:3). Even when the owed thing is not money, the word lends the relationships described a sense of seriousness: what is owed is not incidental, and dealing with it—by forgiveness or by payment—shapes the order of life together.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).




