Exploring the Meaning of Katargeo in Greek
καταργέω means “to abate” and occurs 27 times in Scripture, including Luke 13:7 and multiple places in Romans and 1 Corinthians.
Core Meaning
καταργέω is defined as “to abate.” In the listed verses it is rendered with ideas like “nullify,” “made void,” “done away with,” and “discharged.”
Learn More →Romans Usage
Romans uses καταργέω in questions about nullifying God’s faithfulness and the law (Romans 3:3, 3:31). It also appears for faith being made void, sin being done away with, and discharge from the law (Romans 4:14; 6:6; 7:2; 7:6).
Learn More →Other Occurrences
In Luke 13:7 it appears in the parable of the fruitless fig tree. It is also listed in 1 Corinthians 1:28.
Learn More →καταργέω expresses the abating of something—its force, effect, or continuing claim. In the passages gathered here, it is used for abating what proves fruitless, what would invalidate trust, what empties promises, what breaks bondage, what releases from binding law, and what is brought to nothing in contrast to what endures.

Occurrences
Luke 13:7 — “He said to the vine dresser, ‘Behold, these three years I have come looking for fruit on this fig tree, and found none. Cut it down. Why does it waste the soil?’”
In this agricultural scene, the concern is that the fig tree contributes nothing despite repeated opportunity (“these three years”). The idea of abating appears as a practical judgment: the tree’s continued standing is treated as something that should be reduced to zero—its unproductive use of ground (“waste the soil”) should be brought to an end.

Romans 3:3 — “For what if some were without faith? Will their lack of faith nullify the faithfulness of God?”
Here the verb is posed as a pointed question about whether human unfaithfulness has the power to abate something divine. The sentence frames “lack of faith” as a possible agent that could empty out “the faithfulness of God,” probing whether distrust can diminish God’s reliability in practice.
Romans 3:31 — “Do we then nullify the law through faith? May it never be! No, we establish the law.”
The same issue—abating by “nullify”—is now applied to “the law.” The verse turns the idea into a theological objection and answer: faith is not presented as something that drains the law of its standing; instead, the reply contrasts abating with “establish,” setting the two as opposites within the argument.
Romans 4:14 — “For if those who are of the law are heirs, faith is made void, and the promise is made of no effect.”
This line piles up two results: “faith is made void” and “the promise is made of no effect.” The abating sense is logical and relational: if inheritance is fixed “of the law,” then faith is reduced to emptiness and the promise loses operative power. The language depicts not mere weakness but an outcome where something no longer functions as what it claims to be.
Romans 6:6 — “knowing this, that our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be done away with, so that we would no longer be in bondage to sin.”
The verb is embedded in a purpose clause: “that the body of sin might be done away with.” The abating here is directed toward sin’s embodied regime (“body of sin”), and the practical result is emancipation: “so that we would no longer be in bondage to sin.” The word therefore serves to name a decisive reduction of sin’s controlling capacity, aimed at ending slavery-like constraint.
Romans 7:2 — “For the woman that has a husband is bound by law to the husband while he lives, but if the husband dies, she is discharged from the law of the husband.”
Abating is expressed as “discharged from the law of the husband.” The binding is explicitly legal (“bound by law”), lasting “while he lives,” and death changes the status. The verb marks the termination of an obligation’s claim: the law that bound her is treated as no longer holding her under its constraint.
Romans 7:6 — “But now we have been discharged from the law, having died to that in which we were held; so that we serve in newness of the spirit, and not in oldness of the letter.”
The same release is extended to “we”: “discharged from the law.” The abating is connected to death (“having died to that in which we were held”), and its outcome is a change of mode of service: “newness of the spirit” versus “oldness of the letter.” The verb thus functions to describe a real change in jurisdiction—what once held no longer holds, and a new form of service follows.
1 Corinthians 1:28 — “God chose the lowly things of the world, and the things that are despised, and the things that don’t exist, that he might bring to nothing the things that exist,”
Here καταργέω is expressed as “bring to nothing.” The focus is not legal discharge but divine reversal: God’s choice of what is “lowly,” “despised,” and even “don’t exist” is aimed at abating “the things that exist.” The verb conveys the stripping away of status and effect—what appears substantial is rendered nothing in the face of God’s chosen means.
1 Corinthians 2:6 — “We speak wisdom, however, among those who are full grown, yet a wisdom not of this world nor of the rulers of this world who are coming to nothing.”
The rulers are described as “coming to nothing,” a present movement toward abatement. The contrast sets a wisdom “not of this world” against leaders whose trajectory is dissolution. The verb contributes an eschatological pressure within the sentence: worldly authority is portrayed as headed toward being reduced, not merely challenged.
1 Corinthians 6:13 — ““Foods for the belly, and the belly for foods,” but God will bring to nothing both it and them. But the body is not for sexual immorality, but for the Lord; and the Lord for the body.”
The slogan about food and belly is met with a divine act: “God will bring to nothing both it and them.” The abating is comprehensive—both the appetite-related category (“Foods… the belly…”) and its counterpart are destined for nullification. Against that, the verse sets a different orientation for “the body,” grounding bodily life not in transient cycles but in relation “for the Lord.” καταργέω sharpens the contrast between what is treated as temporary and what is given a lasting purpose in the argument.
1 Corinthians 13:8 — “Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will be done away with. Where there are various languages, they will cease. Where there is knowledge, it will be done away with.”
The verb is used twice for “prophecies” and “knowledge”: they “will be done away with.” In the immediate contrast, “Love never fails,” so the abating marks certain gifts or modes of knowing as not permanent. The sentence does not call them worthless; rather, it assigns them an endpoint, placing them in a category of realities whose role will be brought to completion and thus removed from operation.
1 Corinthians 13:10 — “but when that which is complete has come, then that which is partial will be done away with.”
This verse provides the logic behind the previous abating: “when that which is complete has come,” “that which is partial will be done away with.” The verb depicts what happens to partiality in the presence of completeness: the partial does not merely shrink; it is abolished as a functioning condition, its necessity and effect abated by the arrival of what is complete.

Sense and Usage
Across these contexts, καταργέω consistently carries the idea of something being reduced from operative significance to non-operation—abated until it no longer functions as a binding power, an effective promise, or a continuing order. In Luke 13:7 the abating is pictured concretely: an unfruitful tree is to be removed because its continued presence “waste[s] the soil.” The verb’s force fits the scene: what produces nothing is treated as something that must itself be brought to nothing with respect to its place in the orchard.
In Romans 3–4, the verb operates in argumentation: it tests whether one reality can drain another of its effect. “Nullify the faithfulness of God” (Romans 3:3) and “nullify the law through faith” (Romans 3:31) both frame the word as a feared consequence—something would lose its standing if nullified. Romans 4:14 then uses the same logic to show how a certain arrangement would empty “faith” and render “the promise” ineffective. In these uses, abating is not a physical destruction but a cancellation of force: a thing might remain named, yet be made “void” or “of no effect” as a functioning reality within the relationship being discussed.
Romans 6:6–7:6 turns to abating as release from mastery and legal claim. “Bondage to sin” (Romans 6:6) describes a lived condition, and “done away with” targets the “body of sin” so that bondage ends. In Romans 7:2 and 7:6, “discharged from the law” names a changed status: a binding law no longer binds. The scenes share a common contour: abating is the ending of a former hold (“that in which we were held”), producing a new situation of freedom and a different mode of service.
In 1 Corinthians, the word is used for reversal, transience, and the setting aside of partial realities. God “bring[s] to nothing the things that exist” (1 Corinthians 1:28), and worldly “rulers… are coming to nothing” (1 Corinthians 2:6): both portray abating as a downward movement of what seems solid in the world’s eyes. In 1 Corinthians 6:13, the abating is future and sweeping—God will nullify both “foods” and “the belly”—reinforcing the argument that the body’s significance cannot be grounded in what will be brought to nothing. Finally, 1 Corinthians 13:8 and 13:10 use the verb for the ending of prophecies, knowledge, and the partial when completeness arrives. In that setting, abating functions as a marker of temporality: certain things belong to a stage that will pass, not because they “fail,” but because a fuller condition supersedes them and renders them no longer operative.
Imagery and Contrast
The passages attach καταργέω to vivid contrasts: a tree that “waste[s] the soil” versus fruitfulness (Luke 13:7), faithfulness that is questioned but not emptied (Romans 3:3), law that is not drained by faith but opposed to being nullified (Romans 3:31), bondage that is ended (Romans 6:6), and binding law that no longer holds (Romans 7:2, 7:6). In 1 Corinthians, the word highlights the difference between what appears to “exist” and what God can “bring to nothing” (1 Corinthians 1:28), between rulers and their fading course (1 Corinthians 2:6), between bodily slogans and God’s nullifying verdict (1 Corinthians 6:13), and between what “never fails” and what “will be done away with” when completeness comes (1 Corinthians 13:8, 13:10). Throughout, the verb gives the texts a sharp way to speak of a reality whose operative force is being ended.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).




