Exploring the Meaning of Diastrepho in Greek
διαστρέφω (Diastrepho) means “to pervert” and appears 7 times in Scripture: Matthew 17:17; Luke 9:41; Luke 23:2; Acts 13:8,10; Acts 20:30; Philippians 2:15.
Core Meaning
διαστρέφω is defined as “to pervert.” In Luke 23:2 it is used in the accusation of “perverting the nation.”
Learn More →Gospel Contexts
In Matthew 17:17 and Luke 9:41 Jesus addresses a “faithless and perverse generation.” Philippians 2:15 also speaks of a “crooked and perverse generation.”
Learn More →Acts Usage
Acts uses διαστρέφω for opposition that turns others away from the faith (Acts 13:8) and for speaking “perverse things” to draw away disciples (Acts 20:30). Acts 13:10 includes a rebuke calling for an end to such action.
Learn More →διαστρέφω describes the act of perverting—turning something from a straight or proper course into a distorted one. It appears in Gospel rebukes of a “perverse generation,” in accusations leveled at Jesus, and in apostolic warnings about influences that divert people from faith and the Lord’s ways.

Occurrences
“Jesus answered, “Faithless and perverse generation! How long will I be with you? How long will I bear with you? Bring him here to me.”” (Matthew 17:17)
Here the word marks the generation as “perverse” within Jesus’ complaint about enduring them. In the scene, the term functions as a moral diagnosis paired with “Faithless”: the problem is not merely inability but a bent condition of the wider setting in which the suffering child is brought for help. The rebuke frames the need for Jesus’ direct intervention (“Bring him here to me”) as a response to a community that has become warped from what it should be.

“Jesus answered, “Faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you and bear with you? Bring your son here.”” (Luke 9:41)
Luke uses the same pairing—“Faithless and perverse”—and the same rhetorical strain: “how long shall I be with you and bear with you?” The perversion named by διαστρέφω is not abstract; it is the moral atmosphere surrounding a desperate request. The command “Bring your son here” again places Jesus as the one who addresses what the perverse generation cannot set right on its own in this moment.
“They began to accuse him, saying, “We found this man perverting the nation, forbidding paying taxes to Caesar, and saying that he himself is Christ, a king.”” (Luke 23:2)
In this accusation, διαστρέφω is cast as a political-social charge: “perverting the nation.” The accusers present perversion as a kind of public misdirection with concrete alleged outcomes—tax resistance and royal claims. The word supplies the interpretive frame for their list of complaints: whatever Jesus says or does is characterized as a force that warps communal allegiance and order.
“But Elymas the sorcerer (for so is his name by interpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn the proconsul away from the faith.” (Acts 13:8)
Although the English wording here speaks of “turn[ing] the proconsul away from the faith,” the scene depicts the same dynamic associated with διαστρέφω in this cluster of passages: opposition that aims to deflect someone from a right course. Elymas “withstood them,” and his purpose is directional—away from faith—so the action is not merely resistance but an attempt to bend another person’s allegiance off-track.
“and said, “You son of the devil, full of all deceit and all cunning, you enemy of all righteousness, will you not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?” (Acts 13:10)
This verse uses the verb explicitly for an ongoing activity: “will you not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord?” The phrase “right ways” sets up a contrast between what is straight and what is twisted; perversion is the active distortion of a path that is described as “right.” The surrounding accusations (“deceit,” “cunning,” “enemy of all righteousness”) anchor the verb in a moral arena: perversion here is not a mistake but a deliberate interference with the Lord’s ways.
“Men will arise from among your own selves, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them.” (Acts 20:30)
διαστρέφω marks the content of speech: “perverse things.” The effect is relational and communal: such speaking aims “to draw away the disciples after them.” In other words, perversion is presented not only as an inward corruption but as a communicative strategy that reorients a group’s loyalty. The danger is intensified by its origin—“from among your own selves”—so the perverting influence comes from within the community and operates through persuasive words.
“that you may become blameless and harmless, children of God without defect in the middle of a crooked and perverse generation, among whom you are seen as lights in the world,” (Philippians 2:15)
In Philippians the term again modifies “generation,” now paired with “crooked.” The surrounding exhortation contrasts two ways of being: “blameless and harmless” and “without defect” versus the environment described as twisted. The image of believers “seen as lights in the world” depends on that contrast: perversion is the bent background against which a different kind of life becomes visible.

Sense and Usage
Across these passages, διαστρέφω consistently portrays perversion as a deviation from what is right, true, or properly directed. The word is flexible enough to describe a whole “generation” (Matthew 17:17; Luke 9:41; Philippians 2:15), a nation as an object of manipulation (Luke 23:2), the “right ways of the Lord” as something targeted for distortion (Acts 13:10), and “things” spoken in order to redirect disciples (Acts 20:30). In each setting, the idea is not simply that something is wrong, but that it has been bent or turned so that it no longer runs in the direction it ought.
The Gospel uses highlight perversion as a broad moral condition. When Jesus laments, “How long will I be with you? How long will I bear with you?” the word carries a sense of weariness at enduring a setting that is out of alignment. The term’s coupling with “faithless” sharpens the picture: faithlessness describes lack, while perversion depicts distortion—an active or settled crookedness. The result is a community environment in which help is sought yet the underlying posture is misdirected, prompting Jesus’ strong address before the child is brought to him.
Luke 23:2 shows the word’s usefulness in hostile rhetoric: “perverting the nation” is a compact way to label someone as a corrupting force within public life. The accusation is then supported (in their telling) by specific claims about taxes and kingship. The verb thus functions as a charge of harmful influence—one person allegedly reshaping the nation’s orientation in ways that threaten established authority.
Acts develops the term in an explicitly directional and communal frame. In Acts 13, the conflict is between apostolic proclamation and a counter-effort “seeking to turn the proconsul away from the faith” (Acts 13:8). Acts 13:10 then names the deeper character of that counter-effort: it is perverting “the right ways of the Lord.” The text places perversion in the realm of moral opposition—“enemy of all righteousness”—and presents it as persistent activity that must be stopped (“cease”). Acts 20:30 brings the same concept into the church’s future: perversion appears through “speaking perverse things,” with a defined aim—“to draw away the disciples after them.” Here perversion is not primarily about external persecution but about internal distortion through teaching or rhetoric that reorients followers toward a new center.
Philippians 2:15 gathers the threads into a social contrast. A “crooked and perverse generation” is the surrounding world in which believers are called to be “children of God without defect.” Perverse, in this framing, is the environment’s bent character; the community’s calling is not to mirror that bend but to stand out against it, so that they are “seen as lights in the world.” The word therefore contributes to a stark moral landscape: a twisted setting that makes straightness and purity visible by contrast.
Imagery in Context
The passages repeatedly set perversion against a standard described in terms of straightness and rightness: “right ways” (Acts 13:10) and the opposite descriptions “crooked and perverse” (Philippians 2:15). Whether the object is a nation, a proconsul’s faith, disciples within the church, or the moral character of a generation, διαστρέφω evokes the picture of a path that can be bent—by deceitful influence, by misleading speech, or by a settled communal posture—so that it no longer leads where it should.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).





