Understanding the Significance of Diaballo in Greek
διαβάλλω means “to accuse” and appears once in Scripture, in Luke 16:1.
Scripture Occurrence
This verb occurs 1 time in Scripture. The occurrence is in Luke 16:1.
Learn More →διαβάλλω means “to accuse,” and it appears in the parable scene where a wealthy man hears a charge concerning his manager. The word frames the manager’s crisis as beginning with a reported claim brought before his master.

Root and Related Words
διαβάλλω is connected with διά (dia), meaning “through/because of” (Strong’s G1223), and βάλλω (ballo), meaning “to throw: throw” (Strong’s G906). These related forms situate the verb within a verbal family that includes dia and ballo as its stated components.

Occurrences
“He also said to his disciples, “There was a certain rich man who had a manager. An accusation was made to him that this man was wasting his possessions.” (Luke 16:1)
Here διαβάλλω supplies the initiating action that brings the manager under scrutiny: “An accusation was made to him.” The grammar of the sentence places the rich man as the one who receives the accusation (“to him”), so the verb’s force is not merely that a wrongdoing exists, but that a charge is conveyed to the authority who can act on it. The content of what is alleged is stated immediately: “that this man was wasting his possessions.” In the story’s setup, the manager’s peril is mediated through a claim presented to the master, and the accusation functions as the hinge that moves the narrative from a settled arrangement (“had a manager”) to impending accountability.

The accusation also shapes how the manager is introduced. Before any direct conversation, evidence, or admission appears in the verse, the manager is defined by what is reported about him. The word therefore carries a social and administrative weight within the parable’s setting: it is the kind of statement that reaches the ear of a “rich man” and concerns the handling of “his possessions.” By making the accusation the first trigger, the text presents the manager’s situation as one in which reputation and reported conduct have immediate consequences in a household economy.
Sense and Usage
In Luke 16:1, “to accuse” is not portrayed as a private suspicion but as a communicative act directed to someone in a position of judgment. The construction “was made to him” highlights that an accusation functions when it is brought before the person who can evaluate and respond. In this parable context, the accusation is tied to stewardship: the alleged fault is “wasting his possessions,” and the possessions belong to the rich man. Thus the verb’s sense operates within a relationship of delegated responsibility: the manager oversees what is not his own, and the accusation alleges a breach of that trust.
The verse also shows how an accusation can summarize behavior in a way that demands action without narrating the details. The wording does not describe specific transactions; instead, the charge is cast broadly (“was wasting his possessions”), leaving the reader with the weight of the allegation rather than its proof. In that way, διαβάλλω contributes to the parable’s tension: it introduces a contested claim that redefines the manager’s standing and sets the stage for whatever response follows from the rich man.
Because the accusation is presented as something “made” to the master, the verb’s usage here implies a movement of information within a network of servants and oversight. The manager stands at one level of authority under the rich man, yet the accusation bypasses the manager and travels upward to the owner. The scene therefore treats “to accuse” as an act that can realign relationships: the master is placed in the role of receiver and potential judge, while the manager becomes the object of an allegation about mismanagement.
Imagery
The imagery attached to διαβάλλω in Luke 16:1 is the quiet but decisive moment when a report reaches a household’s head: a manager’s position is destabilized not by an immediate confrontation, but by an accusation delivered to his master. The word evokes the turning point created when an allegation about “wasting” entrusted “possessions” is put into the hands of the one who owns them.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).





