Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek statistics
HomeGreek Words › Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek
Meaning, Biblical Use & Significance

Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek

ἀπειλή apeile (ap-i-lay’) Noun, feminine

ἀπειλή means “threat” and occurs four times in Scripture: Acts 4:17, Acts 4:29, Acts 9:1, and Ephesians 6:9.

Core Meaning

The word ἀπειλή is defined as “threat.” It names intimidation directed toward others.

Learn More →

Acts Occurrences

In Acts 4:17 authorities threaten to stop speech, and in Acts 4:29 believers ask God to notice their threats. Acts 9:1 describes Saul “breathing threats and slaughter” against the Lord’s disciples.

Learn More →

Ephesians Instruction

Ephesians 6:9 commands masters to give up threatening. The verse grounds this in the shared Master of both masters and servants.

Learn More →

ἀπειλή names a “threat” as it is spoken, perceived, or practiced in settings of opposition and authority. It appears in Acts in the early conflict between the apostles and civic-religious leadership and again in Saul’s persecuting zeal, and it also appears in Ephesians in instruction about the conduct of masters.

Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek statistics

ἀπειλή is connected with the verb apeileō (ἀπειλέω), “to threaten” (Strong’s G546). The noun expresses the threatened action as a thing present in the situation—something that can be issued, observed, or set aside.

Guide to Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek

Occurrences

“But so that this spreads no further among the people, let’s threaten them, that from now on they don’t speak to anyone in this name.” (Acts 4:17)

Here ἀπειλή functions as an intentional tactic: the speakers propose threatening as a means of containment. The quoted purpose clause (“so that this spreads no further among the people”) shows the threat aimed at restricting speech (“they don’t speak to anyone in this name”). In this scene, a threat is not merely harsh language; it is a calculated pressure applied to shape future behavior. The future-oriented phrasing (“from now on”) also highlights a threat’s forward reach: it seeks to govern what will be said next, not simply to punish what has already been said.

Key insight about Understanding the Meaning of Apeile in Greek

“Now, Lord, look at their threats, and grant to your servants to speak your word with all boldness,” (Acts 4:29)

In this prayer the “threats” become a visible feature of the apostles’ environment—something they ask the Lord to “look at.” ἀπειλή is plural and treated as an ongoing reality rather than a single utterance. The request that follows (“grant to your servants to speak your word with all boldness”) frames the threats as a counterforce to speech, the very thing the servants are asking to continue doing. The word therefore marks the tension between coercive pressure and public proclamation: threats attempt to mute; boldness answers by continuing to speak.

“But Saul, still breathing threats and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went to the high priest” (Acts 9:1)

In this narrative description ἀπειλή is paired with “slaughter,” and the combination is portrayed as something Saul “breath[es].” The image presents threats as so continuous and close to him that they are like the air he exhales—an atmosphere of menace accompanying his movement (“went to the high priest”). ἀπειλή contributes the verbal or communicative edge of persecution: the hostility is not only physical (“slaughter”) but also expressed in threatening intention. It conveys a disposition that precedes action, giving a picture of violence already forming in speech and resolve before any specific act is narrated in this verse.

“You masters, do the same things to them, and give up threatening, knowing that he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven, and there is no partiality with him.” (Ephesians 6:9)

In this instruction ἀπειλή is treated as a practice that can be discontinued: “give up threatening.” The word stands for a way of exercising authority that relies on intimidation. The command is not framed as a general call to kindness but as a specific renunciation of threat-making within the relationship between “masters” and those under them (“to them”). The ground offered is theological and relational: the one in heaven is “both their Master and yours,” and “there is no partiality with him.” In that light, ἀπειλή represents an abuse of earthly power that forgets a shared accountability; the verse presses masters to relate without coercive menace because both parties stand under the same higher Master.

Sense and Usage

Across these passages, ἀπειλή consistently names a threat as a tool of pressure used to control others. In Acts 4:17 it is proposed as a deliberate measure to stop a message from spreading; the threat is directed at speech, aiming to silence “from now on.” Acts 4:29 then shows the recipients of such pressure treating threats as an external opposition that must be faced, not by retreating into silence but by asking for courage to continue speaking. In Acts 9:1 the word is drawn into the portrayal of persecuting energy: threats are not incidental but part of the very posture Saul is described as exhaling, tightly bound to harm (“slaughter”) and to official pursuit (“went to the high priest”).

Ephesians 6:9 relocates the term into household authority and moral instruction. There, threatening is not depicted as a hostile tactic from outsiders but as a temptation for insiders who hold power. The command “give up threatening” treats ἀπειλή as something that can be embedded in ordinary governance—used to manage, compel, or intimidate. The verse’s reasoning places threat-making under judgment by a higher standard: because a heavenly Master stands over both parties without partiality, a master’s reliance on threats is exposed as incongruent with that shared standing.

These contexts together show ἀπειλή operating in both public and private spheres: in public dispute where authorities seek to suppress a name and a message, and in personal or social relationships where one party can dominate another. The noun can describe an explicit step (“let’s threaten them”), a recognized pattern (“look at their threats”), a pervasive disposition (“breathing threats”), or a habitual method to be abandoned (“give up threatening”). In every case, the core idea remains a threat as coercive pressure: it leverages fear of consequences to shape another person’s speech or conduct.

Imagery in Context

The passages give ἀπειλή vivid contours. It can be a calculated instrument deployed to keep something from “spread[ing]” (Acts 4:17), and it can be the oppressive background against which bold speech is sought (Acts 4:29). It can also be as close and continuous as breath—an atmosphere exhaled alongside violence (Acts 9:1). In a different register, it can be a controllable habit in the exercise of authority, something masters are commanded to relinquish in view of heaven’s impartial Master (Ephesians 6:9).

Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).

Books Worth Reading:
Sponsored
Book 3307Book 3301Book 3340Book 3317Book 3333Book 3313

About the Author

Ministry Voice

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want More Great Content?

Check Out These Articles 

Free Sermon

Series Bundle

Get our October sermon series bundle with message outline, Graphics, Video and

more completely FREE!!!

What email should we send it to?

mba ads=18