Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek statistics
HomeGreek Words › Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek
Meaning, Biblical Use & Significance

Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek

καταλείπω kataleipo (kat-al-i’-po) Verb

καταλείπω means “to leave behind” and occurs 24 times in Scripture, including Matthew 4:13; 19:5; 21:17 and Mark 10:7; 12:19–21; 14:52.

Core Meaning

καταλείπω is defined as “to leave behind.” In the listed passages it describes leaving a place, people, or possessions.

Learn More →

Gospel Examples

In Matthew 4:13 Jesus leaves Nazareth and lives in Capernaum, and in Matthew 21:17 he leaves them and goes to Bethany. In Mark 14:52 a young man leaves the linen cloth and flees.

Learn More →

Family Context

In Matthew 19:5 and Mark 10:7 it is used of a man leaving father and mother to join his wife. In Mark 12:19–21 it describes dying and leaving a wife behind, with no children left.

Learn More →

καταλείπω means “to leave behind.” In the passages where it appears, it describes actions ranging from ordinary relocation and travel, to the reshaping of family ties, to abandonment in the face of danger, to leaving someone with work, and to leaving persons or possessions in ways that highlight what is forsaken and what is pursued.

Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek statistics

Occurrences

“Leaving Nazareth, he came and lived in Capernaum, which is by the sea, in the region of Zebulun and Naphtali,” (Matthew 4:13)

Here the verb marks a decisive move: Nazareth is not merely departed from; it is left behind as Jesus comes to live in another town. The sentence frames the action as a transition of place and settled life—one location is put in the past, and a new one becomes home.

Key insight about Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek

“An evil and adulterous generation seeks after a sign, and there will be no sign given to it, except the sign of the prophet Jonah.” He left them, and departed. (Matthew 16:4)

In this scene, leaving behind is relational and confrontational. After the pronouncement, “He left them” signals a break in engagement: he ends the exchange and removes himself. The added “and departed” underscores that the leaving is not abstract; it is enacted as withdrawal from their presence.

“and said, ‘For this cause a man shall leave his father and mother, and shall be joined to his wife; and the two shall become one flesh?’” (Matthew 19:5)

The verb functions within a statement about marriage: leaving behind is the prerequisite movement that makes joining possible. The focus is not on travel but on a reordering of primary attachment—father and mother are left behind so that the man may be “joined to his wife,” forming a new unity.

“He left them, and went out of the city to Bethany, and camped there.” (Matthew 21:17)

Leaving here is again a conscious separation from people. The sequence “left… went out… camped” paints leaving behind as the first step in a change of setting: the city and those present there are put behind him as he relocates for the night.

“For this cause a man will leave his father and mother, and will join to his wife,” (Mark 10:7)

As in Matthew’s parallel, leaving behind is placed at the start of forming a marriage bond. The verb carries the sense of stepping away from the prior household relationship so that joining to a wife becomes the defining connection.

“Teacher, Moses wrote to us, ‘If a man’s brother dies, and leaves a wife behind him, and leaves no children, that his brother should take his wife, and raise up offspring for his brother.’” (Mark 12:19)

In the Sadducees’ case study, leaving behind is what death produces for survivors. A man “leaves a wife behind him” and “leaves no children”—two different kinds of what remains after him. The verb emphasizes the state of the household after his passing: a widow remains, and there is an absence of offspring.

“The second took her, and died, leaving no children behind him. The third likewise;” (Mark 12:21)

The repeated pattern uses the verb to stress continuity of outcome: death is followed by leaving behind an empty line—“no children.” The phrase “behind him” keeps the image fixed on what remains in the wake of each husband’s death.

“but he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.” (Mark 14:52)

Here leaving behind is sudden and urgent. The linen cloth is abandoned as the young man flees; what is left behind is a tangible object dropped in the moment of escape. The verb sharpens the cost and haste of flight: he preserves himself by leaving the garment behind.

“He left everything, and rose up and followed him.” (Luke 5:28)

Leaving behind is totalized: “everything” is named as the object. The action is paired with “rose up and followed him,” so leaving behind functions as the decisive break that enables discipleship—what was formerly possessed or occupied is set aside in order to pursue another path.

“But Martha was distracted with much serving, and she came up to him, and said, “Lord, don’t you care that my sister left me to serve alone? Ask her therefore to help me.”” (Luke 10:40)

The verb carries a social and emotional weight: one sister experiences herself as being left behind in work. “Left me to serve alone” portrays leaving not as neutral departure but as remaining responsibility placed on another person; the action is felt as abandonment in the midst of “much serving.”

“Which of you men, if you had one hundred sheep, and lost one of them, wouldn’t leave the ninety-nine in the wilderness, and go after the one that was lost, until he found it?” (Luke 15:4)

In this parable question, leaving behind is strategic: the ninety-nine are left “in the wilderness” in order to pursue the one lost sheep. The verb highlights a deliberate choice to set something temporarily unattended while attention is directed elsewhere, sharpening the contrast between the many that remain and the one that is sought.

“The third took her, and likewise the seven all left no children, and died.” (Luke 20:31)

This retelling condenses the same scenario into a cumulative result: “the seven all left no children.” The verb does not simply report deaths; it frames the significant aftermath that each death leaves behind, building the argument around what remains (or, here, what does not remain) after all seven marriages.

Guide to Exploring the Meaning of Kataleipo in Greek

Sense and Usage

Across these contexts, “to leave behind” operates on several levels of human life. It can describe ordinary movement from one place to another (Matthew 4:13), or a purposeful withdrawal from a group after conflict or decision (Matthew 16:4; Matthew 21:17). In such scenes the verb does more than note departure: it marks a boundary between what is now past and what follows—Nazareth behind, Capernaum ahead; an interlocutor left, a journey begun.

In teaching about marriage (Matthew 19:5; Mark 10:7), leaving behind is a relational reorientation. The verb is paired with joining, so the act of leaving is not aimless separation; it clears space for a new bond to be formed. The force of the word lies in its ability to name what must be placed behind in order for a new unity to take shape.

In the levirate-style case presented in Mark and Luke (Mark 12:19; Mark 12:21; Luke 20:31), leaving behind belongs to the aftermath of death. The repeated phrase “leaves… behind him” ties the verb to what remains in the world of the living. Notably, the objects of leaving behind vary: a wife remains as a widow, and children do not remain at all. The verb thus serves to frame family continuity and discontinuity in terms of what is left in one’s wake.

The verb can also depict abandonment in crisis (Mark 14:52), where leaving behind is immediate and uncalculated: the linen cloth is simply dropped. By contrast, leaving behind can be deliberate and comprehensive, as when Levi “left everything” in order to follow (Luke 5:28). Both use the same core idea—something is placed behind and no longer held—but the narrative setting determines whether the leaving is forced by danger or chosen for a new allegiance.

Finally, Luke 10:40 and Luke 15:4 show how leaving behind can be experienced either as being neglected (“left me to serve alone”) or as a calculated prioritization (“leave the ninety-nine… and go after the one”). In one, the one left behind feels the burden of solitary labor; in the other, the many left behind serve as the background against which the value of the lost one is highlighted. The verb’s flexibility allows it to name both the pain of being left with responsibility and the purposeful setting aside of the secure in order to seek the endangered.

Imagery

The passages attach vivid, concrete images to leaving behind: a town left for another home (Matthew 4:13), a group left after a sharp exchange (Matthew 16:4), parents left as a marriage bond is formed (Matthew 19:5), a widow and the absence of children left in the wake of repeated deaths (Mark 12:19; Luke 20:31), a linen cloth left on the ground during a nighttime flight (Mark 14:52), possessions and former life left as one rises to follow (Luke 5:28), a person left carrying work alone (Luke 10:40), and ninety-nine sheep left in the wilderness while one is sought (Luke 15:4). In each case, the verb draws attention to what remains behind and thus to the cost, consequence, or purpose of the next step.

Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).

Books Worth Reading:
Sponsored
Book 3317Book 3333Book 3341Book 3307Book 3313Book 3301

About the Author

Ministry Voice

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want More Great Content?

Check Out These Articles 

Free Sermon

Series Bundle

Get our October sermon series bundle with message outline, Graphics, Video and

more completely FREE!!!

What email should we send it to?

mba ads=18