Exploring the Meaning of Katagelao in Greek
καταγελάω means “to mock” and occurs three times in Scripture: Matthew 9:24, Mark 5:40, and Luke 8:53.
Core Meaning
καταγελάω means “to mock.” In the listed passages, it is rendered as “ridiculing” or “ridiculed.”
Learn More →Gospel Occurrences
This verb appears three times in the Gospels: Matthew 9:24, Mark 5:40, and Luke 8:53. Each occurrence records people ridiculing Jesus’ words about the girl.
Learn More →Narrative Context
In Matthew 9:24 and Luke 8:53, the crowd ridicules Jesus when he says the girl is “sleeping.” In Mark 5:40, after they ridicule him, he puts them all out.
Learn More →καταγελάω expresses the act of mocking, a response of scornful derision. In the Gospels it appears in a tightly focused narrative setting: the crowd’s reaction to Jesus’ words about a girl whom others regard as dead.

Occurrences
Matthew 9:24 — he said to them, “Make room, because the girl isn’t dead, but sleeping.” They were ridiculing him.
Here the verb is set directly against Jesus’ spoken directive and interpretation of the situation. The scene moves in two beats: first, Jesus addresses “them” with an instruction (“Make room”) and a reason (“because the girl isn’t dead, but sleeping”); second, their response is not compliance or debate but ridicule. καταγελάω thus functions as a social action that rejects his assessment and undermines his authority in the moment. The mocking is aimed at “him,” not merely at the circumstance, and it arises precisely at the point where he reframes the girl’s condition with unexpected words.

The wording also shows that the ridicule happens while the group is still present, before any change in the girl’s condition is narrated. The verb, placed after Jesus’ statement, captures immediate communal contempt—laughter-like scorn directed toward a claim they consider absurd. In this verse, καταγελάω marks the emotional temperature of the room and the relational tension between Jesus and the onlookers.
Mark 5:40 — They ridiculed him. But he, having put them all out, took the father of the child, her mother, and those who were with him, and went in where the child was lying.
In Mark the verb stands at the hinge of the action: “They ridiculed him. But he…” Their ridicule is immediately answered by his decisive control of the setting. καταγελάω here is not simply an attitude; it becomes the catalyst for a boundary being drawn. The text moves from the group’s scorn to Jesus’ removal of the ridiculers (“having put them all out”), narrowing the circle to the child’s parents and a small group of companions.
This occurrence also highlights the public character of the mockery. “They” is plural and broad, and the reaction is sufficient to warrant clearing the room. By narrating the ridicule before the exclusion, Mark presents mocking as incompatible with what is about to happen in the private space “where the child was lying.” The verb therefore contributes to the contrast between an outside community response (ridicule) and an inside scene marked by controlled access and purposeful movement.
Luke 8:53 — They were ridiculing him, knowing that she was dead.
Luke explicitly ties the ridicule to a stated rationale: they mock “knowing that she was dead.” The participial phrasing (“knowing…”) frames the ridicule as grounded in their certainty about the facts as they understand them. καταγελάω, in this verse, is the outward expression of what they take to be settled knowledge, and it functions as a verdict on Jesus’ words before anything further unfolds.
The emphasis on their knowledge gives the mockery a sharpened edge: it is not random cruelty or aimless noise, but scorn fueled by confidence. The verb captures a reaction that flows from perceived reality—death—as a premise that makes Jesus’ stance appear laughable. Luke thus situates mocking within a clash of interpretations: their “knowing” versus his contrary implication.

Sense and Usage
Across these three passages, καταγελάω consistently denotes mocking directed at Jesus in response to what he says about the girl. The mockery is not portrayed as a private thought but as an expressed group reaction, something audible and communal enough to be narrated as an event in the storyline. In Matthew, the ridicule follows immediately after a directive and explanation; in Mark, it precipitates Jesus’ act of putting the ridiculers outside; in Luke, it is explicitly anchored in the crowd’s conviction about the girl’s condition.
The usage shows mocking as a form of opposition that does not engage by asking questions or offering counterarguments. Instead, it dismisses by treating the speaker as worthy of contempt. The object is consistently personal (“him”), underscoring that καταγελάω is aimed at the one who speaks, not merely at an abstract idea. The mockery therefore functions as a public attempt to discredit, reducing Jesus’ words to something that can be laughed away.
These occurrences also show that mocking can coexist with certainty. Luke’s “knowing that she was dead” indicates that ridicule can be presented as the confident response of those who consider themselves informed. In that sense, the verb marks the social behavior that often accompanies a settled conclusion: when people believe the matter is beyond dispute, they may respond to a contrary claim not with investigation but with derision. In Matthew and Mark, even without the explicit “knowing,” the placement of the ridicule right after Jesus’ statement implies that his words collide with the gathered group’s expectations.
Mark’s narrative sequence adds another dimension: mocking is portrayed as something that can be excluded from the crucial space where Jesus is about to act. “Having put them all out” follows directly after “They ridiculed him,” showing a practical response to ridicule—removing the ridiculers—rather than attempting to win them over in the moment. The verb thus participates in the narrative’s spatial dynamics: ridicule belongs to the crowd; the subsequent action belongs to the smaller, permitted group. The mockery is not merely described; it is dealt with through separation.
As a verb, καταγελάω depicts an action performed by a group (“They”) and experienced by an individual (“him”). The repeated pattern—plural mockers, singular target—portrays an imbalance of social force: many against one. Yet in each account, the narrative does not allow the ridicule to set the final frame. Matthew reports the ridicule without extending it; Mark immediately counters it with Jesus’ authority over the room; Luke explains its basis but, by naming it as ridicule, also exposes it as a reaction rather than a conclusion that carries the story forward. In all three, καταγελάω is a momentary eruption of contempt at the boundary between what the crowd assumes and what Jesus declares.
Imagery
The word carries the imagery of a room charged with grief and certainty, where a statement that contradicts shared expectations is met with ridicule. In Matthew and Luke, the mockery hangs in the air as an immediate answer to Jesus’ claim about the girl; in Mark, that same atmosphere is cut off when he puts the ridiculers outside. The verb therefore evokes the sound and posture of dismissive scorn in a gathered crowd, and the narrative response shows that such ridicule, though loud, does not govern what happens next.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).




