Understanding the Meaning of Dusbastaktos in Greek
δυσβάστακτος means “ponderous” and appears in Matthew 23:4 and Luke 11:46.
Scripture Occurrences
This word occurs 2 times in Scripture. The references are Matthew 23:4 and Luke 11:46.
Learn More →Verse Context
In Matthew 23:4 it describes heavy burdens “grievous to be borne.” In Luke 11:46 it describes burdens “difficult to carry.”
Learn More →Dusbastaktos means “ponderous” and appears in two sayings of Jesus where he condemns religious leaders for imposing weighty demands on others without offering help. In both contexts the term belongs to the concrete image of a burden being put on someone’s shoulders and carried with effort.

Root and Related Words
dys- (δυσ-), “hard,” contributes the idea of difficulty. bastazō (βαστάζω), “to carry,” contributes the carrying/bearing imagery; together they form a description of something characterized by the strain it places on the bearer.

Occurrences
“For they bind heavy burdens that are grievous to be borne, and lay them on men’s shoulders; but they themselves will not lift a finger to help them.” (Matthew 23:4)
Here the word functions inside a vivid picture of imposed loads: the leaders “bind” burdens into something like a bundle and then “lay them on men’s shoulders.” Within that physical scene, dusbastaktos characterizes the burdens as not merely heavy in the abstract but as burdens whose very nature is that they press hard on the person who must bear them. The sentence then turns to the leaders’ refusal: “they themselves will not lift a finger to help them.” The adjective therefore sharpens the moral contrast by intensifying the burden-side of the image: what is placed on others is the kind of load that strains a carrier, while the ones who place it refuse even the smallest assistive action. The word’s force is felt in the mismatch between what is demanded (a shoulder-load that taxes the bearer) and what is offered (not even a finger’s help).

“He said, “Woe to you lawyers also! For you load men with burdens that are difficult to carry, and you yourselves won’t even lift one finger to help carry those burdens.” (Luke 11:46)
In Luke, the rebuke is aimed at “lawyers,” and the verb chosen makes the scene even more explicit: “you load men with burdens.” Dusbastaktos describes these burdens as ones whose carrying is a hardship—burdens marked by the kind of weight that makes carrying a demanding task. The second clause repeats the same ethical pattern as Matthew with added precision: “you yourselves won’t even lift one finger to help carry those burdens.” The adjective’s contribution is to keep the focus on the lived experience of the people who must bear what is loaded onto them. Because the leaders are described as refusing to help “carry,” the term sits naturally in a carrying-field of imagery: the issue is not simply that requirements exist, but that they are pressed onto others in a way that makes the act of bearing them onerous, while the imposers stay untouched by the strain.
Sense and Usage
Across these two occurrences, “ponderous” works as a concrete, bodily evaluation: a burden is ponderous when it is the sort of load that bears down on a person and makes bearing it hard work. The contexts make that bodily sense do rhetorical work. Jesus does not speak in the language of abstract policy; he chooses a shoulder-and-finger tableau in which the burden’s character is experienced in muscles and posture. In Matthew the burdens are first described as “heavy,” then further specified as “grievous to be borne,” with the image of shoulders carrying what others have bound up. In Luke the burdens are “difficult to carry,” and the refusal to help is stated in carrying language as well. In both, dusbastaktos intensifies the impression that what is being imposed is not a light or incidental matter, but something that exacts a toll from the one who must carry it.
The adjective also operates relationally: it is not merely a comment on the burdens in isolation, but part of an accusation about how leaders treat other people. The load is ponderous, and the leaders’ help is practically nonexistent. That juxtaposition creates a moral portrait: a ponderous burden placed on “men” becomes a sign of leadership that externalizes difficulty—making others carry what the leaders will not shoulder even in the smallest supportive way. The repeated “lift one finger” phrasing in both sayings anchors the meaning in the smallest imaginable act of assistance; set beside a ponderous burden, even a finger would matter, but the leaders will not provide it. The term therefore contributes to a critique of hypocrisy and lack of compassion by making the weight of the demands feel tangible.
Finally, because the word is used with “burdens” in both places, its sense stays tightly connected to burdens as something borne. It does not describe the people as ponderous, but the things imposed on them; its semantic force lies in qualifying the demands as experienced weight. The contexts keep the adjective from drifting into vaguer notions of seriousness; it stays lodged in the concrete act of bearing, shoulders under a load, and the conspicuous absence of shared carrying.
Imagery
Both sayings paint the same stark picture: a person stooped under a load placed there by others, with the ones responsible standing close enough to “lift a finger” yet refusing. Within that picture, dusbastaktos supplies the felt heaviness of what is borne—ponderous burdens that define the scene by the strain they create.
Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).





