Understanding the Meaning of Distazo in Greek statistics
HomeGreek Words › Understanding the Meaning of Distazo in Greek
Meaning, Biblical Use & Significance

Understanding the Meaning of Distazo in Greek

διστάζω distazo (dis-tad’-zo) Verb

διστάζω (Distazo) means “to doubt” and appears twice in Scripture, in Matthew 14:31 and Matthew 28:17.

Core Meaning

διστάζω means “to doubt.”

Learn More →

Gospel Occurrences

It occurs two times in Scripture, both in the Gospel of Matthew. The references are Matthew 14:31 and Matthew 28:17.

Learn More →

Verse Contexts

In Matthew 14:31, Jesus asks, “why did you doubt?” In Matthew 28:17, some who saw him bowed down, but doubted.

Learn More →

διστάζω means “to doubt,” and it appears in two Matthean scenes: Jesus’ rescue of a sinking disciple and the disciples’ response when they see the risen Jesus.

Understanding the Meaning of Distazo in Greek statistics

Distazo is derived from dis (δίς), “twice.”

Guide to Understanding the Meaning of Distazo in Greek

Occurrences

Matthew 14:31 — “Immediately Jesus stretched out his hand, took hold of him, and said to him, “You of little faith, why did you doubt?””

In this episode the verb is placed inside a direct question from Jesus, framed by urgent physical action: “Immediately Jesus stretched out his hand, took hold of him.” The doubt is not described as a detached, private thought but as something that has a visible crisis-context—someone has needed to be grasped and stabilized. Jesus’ address, “You of little faith,” sets the doubt in contrast with faith, and the question “why did you doubt?” treats it as a turning point that demands explanation. The sentence structure also makes the doubt the focal issue even after the rescue: the hand is stretched out, the person is taken hold of, and then Jesus interprets the moment by naming the doubt. In this scene, therefore, the verb does not simply label uncertainty; it functions as Jesus’ diagnosis of what has occurred in the very moment where help is given and faith is evaluated.

Matthew 28:17 — “When they saw him, they bowed down to him, but some doubted.”

Here the doubt stands alongside worship in a single, tightly balanced statement. The clause “When they saw him” anchors the response in immediate perception: sight prompts action. The next clause, “they bowed down to him,” presents reverence as the dominant response of the group. Yet the following contrast—“but some doubted”—introduces a divided reaction within the same encounter and at the same time. The verb does not replace worship; it qualifies the overall scene by marking that, among those who saw and among those present at the bowing down, there were individuals whose response included doubt. Because the sentence does not explain the cause, the word’s contribution is to name that hesitation plainly as part of the disciples’ varied reaction to seeing him. The placement after “but” gives it rhetorical weight: it is the unexpected counterpoint to the act of bowing down.

Sense and Usage

Across these two passages, “to doubt” is portrayed as a response that arises at decisive moments of encounter with Jesus. In Matthew 14:31 it is singled out by Jesus as the reason a situation has deteriorated to the point where immediate intervention is required; the doubt is treated as accountable (“why did you doubt?”) and is verbally contrasted with “little faith.” The term therefore works in the realm of relational trust: it is not merely indecision between abstract ideas but a wavering that stands over against confidence in Jesus’ presence and help, as Jesus himself frames it.

In Matthew 28:17, by contrast, the word functions within a communal scene, where a unified act (“they bowed down to him”) coexists with a non-unified inner response (“but some doubted”). This shows that doubt can exist even in the presence of outward reverence. The verb’s brevity—no object is stated, no explanation is offered—leaves the emphasis on the fact of doubting rather than on the content of what is doubted. The sentence allows for the coexistence of recognition (they see him), worship (they bow down), and doubt (some doubt), without turning the doubt into the only or final word about the encounter.

Taken together, these occurrences show the same basic action—doubting—operating with different narrative pressures. In the first, it is spoken about in direct address and questioned; in the second, it is narrated as a subgroup’s response alongside worship. In both, it is not presented as a settled stance but as something that happens in the moment of seeing or being helped. The contexts thus tie the verb to liminal experiences: being rescued “immediately” and seeing him and responding. The word names a wavering that becomes significant precisely because the scenes are charged with recognition, dependence, and response.

Imagery in Context

The two passages place doubting against vivid backdrops: an outstretched hand that “took hold of him” and a gathering where “they bowed down to him.” In one, doubt is exposed at the instant of rescue; in the other, it is registered as a countercurrent within worship. Together they give the verb a concrete feel: doubting is not left in the abstract but is heard as Jesus’ question in a crisis and seen as a quiet divergence among those who are bowing down.

Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).

Books Worth Reading:
Sponsored
Book 3301Book 3317Book 3313Book 3307Book 3333

About the Author

Ministry Voice

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want More Great Content?

Check Out These Articles 

mba ads=18