Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek statistics
HomeGreek Words › Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek
Meaning, Biblical Use & Significance

Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek

ἀσύμφωνος asymphonos (as-oom’-fo-nos) Adjective

ἀσύμφωνος means “discordant” and appears once in Scripture, in Acts 28:25.

Core Meaning

ἀσύμφωνος is defined as “discordant.”

Learn More →

Biblical Usage

It occurs one time in Scripture. This occurrence is in Acts 28:25.

Learn More →

Context Note

In Acts 28:25 it is used when people “didn’t agree among themselves.”

Learn More →

ἀσύμφωνος means “discordant” and appears once in the New Testament, in the narrative of Paul’s final meeting with the Jewish leaders at Rome. In that setting it marks a breakdown of agreement within the group and sets the stage for their departure after Paul’s concluding citation.

Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek statistics

ἀσύμφωνος (Asumphonos) is related to σύμφωνος (symphonos), “mutual consent” (Strong’s G4859). It is also linked by Strong’s to A (α, Ἀλφα), “Alpha” (Strong’s G1).

Guide to Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek

Occurrences

“When they didn’t agree among themselves, they departed after Paul had spoken one word, “The Holy Spirit spoke rightly through Isaiah the prophet to our fathers,” (Acts 28:25)

In Acts 28:25 the word characterizes the group’s internal state: their discussion does not reach a shared mind, but fractures into incompatible positions. The narrative highlights the disagreement as mutual (“among themselves”), so the discord is not simply between Paul and his hearers but within the delegation itself. This discordant condition is presented as the immediate context for a decisive movement in the scene—“they departed”—so the word helps explain why the gathering ends without resolution or further unified response.

Key insight about Exploring the Meaning of Asumphonos in Greek

The verse also places the discord in direct proximity to Paul’s final statement: “after Paul had spoken one word.” The discordant situation frames that “one word” as an authoritative closing rather than as an opening for continued negotiation. What follows is not further debate but a pronouncement that appeals to the Spirit’s correctness (“The Holy Spirit spoke rightly”) and to prophetic mediation (“through Isaiah the prophet”), explicitly aimed at the group’s ancestral identity (“to our fathers”). In this way, the word marks the meeting as moving from attempted discussion toward an ending shaped by unresolved divergence and a last, weighty citation.

Sense and Usage

The single attestation anchors “discordant” in a concrete social moment: people in the same room, hearing the same speaker, come away without agreement. The term is not used for an abstract principle but for a relational condition that becomes visible in action—disagreement that leads to separation. Because the narrative joins the discord to departure, the word carries a pragmatic force: discord is not merely a private sentiment but a condition that interrupts deliberation and dissolves the assembly’s coherence.

Within the verse, the discord is also juxtaposed with language of right speech and reliable witness. Paul’s concluding line stresses that the Spirit “spoke rightly,” and he anchors that speech “through Isaiah the prophet.” The discord of the listeners stands over against a claim of settled correctness in the prophetic word. The effect is not to define discordant speech as false within the verse itself, but to show discord as the human response that contrasts with a presented standard of right speaking. In that literary arrangement, “discordant” functions as a marker of resistance to convergence: instead of arriving at mutual consent, the hearers remain divided and the meeting breaks apart.

Because ἀσύμφωνος is related to σύμφωνος (“mutual consent”), its use here is especially pointed: the scene turns on whether a group can hold together in one agreed judgment. The narrative answers that question negatively. The word thus serves as a concise descriptor for a failure of consensus that has immediate narrative consequences—ending the encounter, sending the hearers away, and leaving Paul’s final prophetic appeal hanging over the parting group.

Implied Imagery

The verse pictures discord not as noise but as a gathering that cannot stay joined: a conversation that fractures and results in people leaving. In Acts 28:25 the movement from “didn’t agree among themselves” to “they departed” gives “discordant” the imagery of dispersal—an assembly that breaks up because it cannot find a single shared conclusion.

Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).

Books Worth Reading:
Sponsored
Book 3317Book 3313Book 3301Book 3307Book 3295

About the Author

Ministry Voice

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want More Great Content?

Check Out These Articles 

Free Sermon

Series Bundle

Get our October sermon series bundle with message outline, Graphics, Video and

more completely FREE!!!

What email should we send it to?

mba ads=18