Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek statistics
HomeGreek Words › Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek
Meaning, Biblical Use & Significance

Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek

ἀμφιέννυμι amphiennymi (am-fee-en'-noo-mee) Verb

ἀμφιέννυμι means “to clothe” and appears three times in Scripture: Matthew 6:30; Matthew 11:8; Luke 7:25.

Core Meaning

ἀμφιέννυμι means “to clothe.”

Learn More →

Scripture Occurrences

This verb occurs three times in Scripture: Matthew 6:30, Matthew 11:8, and Luke 7:25.

Learn More →

Context Snapshots

It is used of God clothing the grass of the field (Matthew 6:30) and of people wearing soft clothing (Matthew 11:8; Luke 7:25).

Learn More →

ἀμφιέννυμι means “to clothe.” In the Gospels it appears in Jesus’ teaching about God’s care for the “grass of the field” and in two parallel questions contrasting soft, luxurious dress with the setting of royal houses and courts.

Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek statistics

Related is amphoteros (ἀμφότερος), “both” (Strong’s G297), named as the word from which ἀμφιέννυμι derives.

Guide to Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek

Occurrences

“But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today exists, and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, won’t he much more clothe you, you of little faith?” (Matthew 6:30)

Here ἀμφιέννυμι is used twice—first for what God does for “the grass of the field,” then for what God can do “much more” for the hearers. The scene is deliberately ordinary and fleeting: grass that “today exists” and “tomorrow is thrown into the oven.” The verb frames clothing as something God does directly, not merely as a human activity of dressing oneself. In the logic of the sentence, clothing the grass functions as a visible, present-tense example of divine care; that example is then used as an argument from the lesser to the greater (“much more”). The word therefore carries the weight of the comparison: the same act (to clothe) that is already observed in the field is the act Jesus says God can extend toward people addressed as “you of little faith.” The rhetorical force depends on the concreteness of clothing—something that can be seen—set against the transience of the grass and the implied anxiety of the audience.

Key insight about Exploring the Meaning of Amphiennumi in Greek

“But what did you go out to see? A man in soft clothing? Behold, those who wear soft clothing are in kings’ houses.” (Matthew 11:8)

In this question Jesus uses the idea of being clothed—specified as “soft clothing”—to sharpen what sort of spectacle the crowd expected when they “went out to see.” The phrasing treats clothing as a social marker: softness in garments points to a certain environment (“kings’ houses”) and, by implication, to people who belong there. The verb is embedded in a contrast between where the audience went (“out”) and where such clothing belongs (“in kings’ houses”). ἀμφιέννυμι thus contributes to the argument by making clothing an index of setting and status. The “Behold” draws attention to what is obvious in ordinary experience: those who are dressed in this way are found in royal residences, not in the place the crowd has gone. The word works here by inviting the audience to picture an immediately recognizable kind of dress and the kind of place associated with it.

“But what did you go out to see? A man clothed in soft clothing? Behold, those who are gorgeously dressed, and live delicately, are in kings’ courts.” (Luke 7:25)

Luke’s parallel question likewise hinges on ἀμφιέννυμι in the description “clothed in soft clothing.” The sentence then expands the picture: “those who are gorgeously dressed, and live delicately” belong “in kings’ courts.” Clothing is joined to a whole mode of life (“live delicately”), and both are located in a particular sphere (“kings’ courts”). The verb anchors the opening image—being clothed—while the following descriptors intensify the same social portrait, adding splendor (“gorgeously dressed”) and ease. As in Matthew, the word serves the contrast between the crowd’s destination (“go out”) and the expected place of luxury. The force of ἀμφιέννυμι here is not merely that someone has garments, but that the kind of clothing imagined places the person within an identifiable world of royal privilege.

Sense and Usage

Across these passages, ἀμφιέννυμι expresses clothing as an outward, visible covering that can be used in argument and in social contrast. In Matthew 6:30, the action is attributed to God and placed within the rhythm of created life: grass exists briefly, yet within that brief span it is clothed. The verb therefore serves a pastoral logic: what is publicly observable in the field becomes the basis for a “much more” expectation directed toward people. Clothing is treated as an instance of provision that can be compared across subjects (grass and “you”), so the verb naturally supports a reasoning pattern that moves from a small, short-lived object to human recipients.

In Matthew 11:8 and Luke 7:25, the verb functions in a different register: it identifies the kind of person one would expect to find in royal settings. The reference to “soft clothing” (and in Luke, to being “gorgeously dressed”) makes clothing a shorthand for comfort, refinement, and access to “kings’ houses” or “kings’ courts.” The questions are structured to correct expectations—“what did you go out to see?”—and the clothing image supplies a concrete criterion for those expectations. In these two occurrences, ἀμφιέννυμι is less about provision and more about the recognizability of a social world: certain clothes fit certain places. The verb thus supports a contrast between the open, public “out” where the crowd went and the enclosed, privileged spaces where luxurious clothing is at home.

Read together, the three occurrences show how clothing language can bear both theological and observational weight without changing the basic act expressed by the verb. In one setting, clothing highlights care that reaches even to what is temporary; in the other, clothing highlights the lifestyle and location associated with royalty. In both cases, the verb’s strength lies in its pictorial immediacy: hearers can picture grass clothed in the field, and they can picture a man clothed in soft garments inside royal dwellings. That shared concreteness allows ἀμφιέννυμι to carry comparison (“much more”) and contrast (field/outside versus kings’ houses/courts) with clarity.

Imagery

The imagery tied to ἀμφιέννυμι in these sayings is deliberately visual and spatial. Matthew 6:30 places clothing on the boundary of time—“today” and “tomorrow”—so that a clothed field becomes an emblem of present provision in a passing world. Matthew 11:8 and Luke 7:25 place clothing on the boundary of place—“out” versus “in kings’ houses” or “in kings’ courts”—so that soft, splendid dress becomes an emblem of where certain lives are lived. In all three, the verb invites the reader to see what is worn and to ask what that visible clothing implies about care, value, and setting.

Sources: Lexical data from Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance and the Translators Brief Lexicon of Extended Strongs for Greek (STEPBible, CC BY). Occurrence data from the Translators Amalgamated Greek New Testament (STEPBible, CC BY). Scripture quotations from the World English Bible (public domain).

Books Worth Reading:
Sponsored
Book 3341Book 3307Book 3333Book 3313Book 3301Book 3317

About the Author

Ministry Voice

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}

Want More Great Content?

Check Out These Articles 

Free Sermon

Series Bundle

Get our October sermon series bundle with message outline, Graphics, Video and

more completely FREE!!!

What email should we send it to?

mba ads=18